“Wind is an American success story in Iowa.”

May 16th, 2012

An article in yesterday’s Des Moines Register caught our eye, as it provides yet another piece of compelling evidence that clean energy remains popular, on a bipartisan level, at the local level.  The article is by “Iowa farm boy” Rob Hach, a self-described “registered Republican” who “believe[s] in voting for the best candidate and the one who understands that clean energy is helping to revitalize small towns across Iowa and bringing manufacturing back to America when so many other industries have fled town.”  Here are excerpts (bolding added for emphasis) from Rob Hach’s article:

Today my wife and I have 28 employees and four offices in four states at Anemometry Specialists. We work in the wind industry on turbines. We are proud to be among those who help make Iowa the No. 1 state in the country for wind jobs. Iowa also ranks second in electricity generation from wind.

[...]

And we were able to keep jobs in Iowa. The majority of the people I employ here in Alta are either farm kids or still working on the family farm in the evening. Today, the school district in Alta receives somewhere between 16 percent and 20 percent of its revenue from wind turbines. And almost 30 percent of the taxes paid into the county are off wind turbines.

Wind is an American success story in Iowa.

Hach adds that he’s “not reaping massive profits like the oil billionaires funding these ads with their billions in subsidies and tax breaks,” but is “living invoice to invoice, praying we have enough money to make payroll every two weeks,” participating in an industry which “supports the American farmer and is good for our national security because we still are too dependent on Middle East dictators for our energy needs.” The fact is, this “American success story” can happen in any state, not just Iowa, with smart policies at the state and federal level.  As long as we all listen to people like Rob Hach, not the “oil billionaires.”

Possible Grid-Scale Liquid Metal Battery Breakthrough?

May 16th, 2012

I’m always skeptical when I read a story about a promising new technology that might change the world, and this story on Treehugger, “Grid-Scale Metal Liquid Batteries Could Revolutionize Renewable Energy Use,” is not necessarily an exception. Still, it’s intriguing to think about the enormous possibilities if this were to come to pass.

…the first thing to note is that Professor Sadoway’s grid-scale batteries were designed so cleverly! From the ground up, the goal was to make them dirt-cheap (literally!) and very safe and reliable, which is why they can operate comfortably at high temperatures (something that needs to be constantly cooled has more chances of failing if something unexpected happens). He didn’t just try to stretch an existing design into something bigger, he created them to be grid-scale from the ground up. It’s truly the kind of genius work that should be backed by massive resources, either from venture capitalists or the Department of Energy or whatever. The faster we can bring these to market, the faster we can ramp up intermittent renewable sources of energy way past the point at which they would start to screw up our current grid infrastructure. And we need all the carbon-free energy we can get, especially with China and India rapidly ramping up their coal usage.

One other reason I think this article is worth highlighting is that Donald Sadoway is a serious scientist: an MIT professor of materials chemistry, one of Time Magazine’s “100 Most Influential People in the World,” etc. So perhaps this time, a touted “breakthrough” will really be a breakthrough? Let’s hope!

Five Energy Stories Worth Reading Today (5/16/12)

May 16th, 2012

Here are five recommended reads for today (5/16/12)

  1. A study by Bloomberg New Energy Finance finds that “Power generated from solar photovoltaic (PV) panels is much closer to competitiveness with conventional electricity generation than many policy-makers and commentators have realized,” and that “The shift in prices of solar technology carries major implications for policy and investment decision-makers, especially when it comes to the choice of generating technology and the design of tariff, fiscal and other support policies.”
  2. DeSmogBlog reports: “FreedomWorks, the sister organization to theKoch-funded Americans for Prosperity (AFP), has launched a new website and advertising campaign to convince American voters that the Obama administration and the EPA are out to destroy American jobs.”
  3. According to the Wall Street Journal’s Market Watch, First Solar and SunPower are looking to benefit from Saudi Arabia’s $109 billion solar plan, which aims “to have 41,000 megawatts of solar capacity by 2032.”
  4. Renewable Energy World reports, “Seven months after a trade investigation was launched, American solar companies and Chinese solar manufacturers will finally get a clear picture of the challenges ahead…A determination on the second of the two tariffs is set to be made on May 16 and announced on May 17.”
  5. Iowa Governor Terry Branstad writes in the Wall Street Journal, “Our state is receiving 20% of its electricity from wind farms at stable and dependable rates, and there are over 215 wind-related businesses operating in 55 counties across Iowa, providing jobs for more than 5,000 workers. This success has been replicated across the nation, with more than 470 factories in 43 states producing parts for the industry.”

Yale Survey: Almost Nobody Trusts Fossil Fuel Companies for Global Warming Information

May 15th, 2012

The Yale Project on Climate Change Communication just released their latest national survey results on “Americans’ Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes,” and a couple of the results jumped out at us.

First, the study found that “only 13 percent [of Americans] trust oil, gas and coal companies (e.g., ExxonMobil and Peabody Energy) as sources of information about global warming.” In stark contrast, 74% of Americans trust climate scientists, 47% trust President Obama, and 43% trust the mainstream news media. Overall, the fossil fuel companies came in dead last, behind car companies and consumer goods companies, in terms of who Americans trust regarding information on global warming.

Second, the level of distrust for the fossil fuel companies, at least on this subject, is intense. In fact, despite an aggressive, well-funded campaign by companies like ExxonMobil to sow doubt about climate science, the new Yale survey finds that an astounding 87 percent of Americans distrust the fossil fuel companies for information on global warming, and that a near-majority (48%) of Americans strongly distrust the fossil fuel companies.

The bottom line: despite many millions of dollars spent by the fossil fuel companies to spread disinformation, including funding of science denial groups like the Heartland Institute, on climate science, the American people simply do not trust them for information on this subject. Perhaps the fossil fuel companies might have better spent their money on promoting wind, solar, and other clean energy sources instead?

Five Energy Stories Worth Reading Today (5/15/12)

May 15th, 2012

Here are five recommended reads for today (5/15/12)

  1. Energy Boom reports, “Twenty of the world’s leading off-grid clean energy entrepreneurs sent a letter [yesterday] to World Bank Group president Robert Zoellick requesting $500 million in financial commitments to help them deliver on the world’s energy access goals.”
  2. According to CleanTechnica: “Yet another recent poll showed that Americans really support clean energy, across political affiliations… 76% of Americans (58% of Republicans, 83% of Independents, and 88% of Democrats) want to see ”a reduction in our reliance on nuclear power, natural gas and coal, and instead, launch a national initiative to boost renewable energy and energy efficiency.”
  3. The New York Times reports, “A pioneering proposal to build a wind power transmission line on the ocean floor from southern Virginia to northern New Jersey cleared a hurdle on Monday when the Interior Department opened the way for the project’s sponsors to start work on an environmental impact statement.”
  4. Eric Wesoff of Greentechsolar explains the “anatomy of the SolarWorld US-China Solar Trade Case.”
  5. The Boston Globe reports: “Retail giant Walmart said it plans to install solar panels on top of about half of its roughly 50 Massachusetts stores as early as August as part of an expansion of solar power in the state… once the projects are done, they will be capable of generating a total of about 10.5 megawatts worth of energy, enough to power up to 2,600 homes.”